X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gw0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTPS id 5070237 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:37:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.83.52; envelope-from=samuel.treffinger@gmail.com Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so6290516gwj.25 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:36:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=Ebr+xKRGeYhDHSuJPPUJVlaH2aVhy+plQkcQWD+qltA=; b=IpWpg7mbTvhv+rpKgFN1LH1IfzZU82PlOAuQVfLgvX1AQwnz3ZctuEQeZb+zxT4H3g KzAFOTqKFsYcO4Q/IfTlwYRNCgVhsqhg3fe8DWR57ptT7P8qDcM+I87i/BMyNP/q5rkg X4YJKyI1Rdca2O4QDm5m2GfMshnnobOb3rvKI= Received: by 10.42.115.65 with SMTP id j1mr1528967icq.102.1312209406508; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.2.4] ([98.156.3.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k16sm6808009icc.22.2011.08.01.07.36.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:36:45 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-1042238480 Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8L1) From: Samuel Treffinger Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: PSRU Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:36:40 -0500 To: Rotary motors in aircraft --Apple-Mail-3-1042238480 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks. I'm going to be building a cozy so that's what I needed to know.=20 Sam Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Tracy wrote: > No negative effects that I know of. I used one for awhile on my RV-4 but= was not happy with it's efficiency at high speed. Worked great for takeof= f & climb but area near hub was stalled and draggy at cruise & high speed. >=20 > Works better on canards because that area is in turbulent air anyway. >=20 > Tracy >=20 > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Samuel Treffinger wrote: > Tracy, do you know of any negative side affects of using a IVO magnum infl= ight adjustable prop with your psru?? I think John Slade has that configurat= ion, but I was wondering if you reccommended it, or reccommended against it.= > =20 > Sam >=20 --Apple-Mail-3-1042238480 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Thanks. I'm going to be building a cozy so that's what I needed to know.

Sam

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 1, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Tracy <rwstracy@gmail.com> wrote:

No negative effects that I know of. I used one for awhile on my RV-4 but was not happy with it's efficiency at high speed. Worked great for takeoff & climb but area near hub was stalled and draggy at cruise & high speed.

Works better on canards because that area is in turbulent air anyway.

Tracy

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Samuel Treffinger <samuel.treffinger@gmail.com> wrote:

Tracy, do you know of any negative side affects of using a IVO magnum inflight adjustable prop with your psru?? I think John Slade has that configuration, but I was wondering if you reccommended it, or reccommended against it.

Sam

--Apple-Mail-3-1042238480--