Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #55380
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Filterless Values of MAP FlyRotary] Re: Blower does work
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:26:43 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ok, my bad wag {:>)

Still, sort of hard to understand why you were getting lower manifold pressure with the filter gone and the prop blasting into the TB.  I could understand peaks and valleys, but would sort of think it would average higher rather than lower.

I'm sure you will lets us all know when you do {:>)

Ed

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ernest Christley" <echristley@att.net>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 12:37 PM
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Filterless Values of MAP FlyRotary] Re: Blower does work

Ed Anderson wrote:
Regarding the Filterless values - in looking at your photo, if all you do is remove the filter and leave the curved intake tube in place - then what you may be getting is a prop effect of the wind blast past the end of the tube - causing a possible lowering of pressure in the tube (siphoning out the air trying to go down the tube) - just a WAG.


Not a bad WAG.  What I actually did was remove the elbow with the filter. The throttle body was bare, sucking straight from the prop "blast", or at least what there was of a blast.  It would make sense that the MAP sensor would be wide open to wild fluctuations.

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster