Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to
         :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
        b=LNOtWblurnvny8aO8/L8diY+Wnb8WV0wa94WvPdo7QBd545LFGqq6vccm21UlSTM5S
         zHa6WEJlsJjaK0FEwTBG1lcs5iMSikc6SxyMZrRlD0KnMhI4zumtDYzOrew8benxrM3x
         uDpfjMWwOrSfPBV/FV2djD2xhi991paVwHZ/g=
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Blower does work
References: <list-5023863@logan.com>
From: Tracy <rwstracy@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <list-5023863@logan.com>
Message-Id: <C1F3B382-7C54-4366-A07B-D5CBCC345445@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:03:54 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8F191)

Where is the pressure being measured?=20

Very strange if this is a graph of your actual Manifold Pressure.  Is it?  I=
 can't think of any scenario where the manifold pressure would remain almost=
 constant from 1000 to 5500 rpm unless the prop presented almost no load to t=
he engine.   Even assuming that, I can't see why the MAP should be higher wi=
th the blower on. =20

Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 17, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net> wrote:

> I figured out how to use a spreadsheet and graphed the MAP based on RPM.  R=
esults below.
> <blower_efficacy.png>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List=
.html