X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <echristley@att.net>
Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j)
  with ESMTPS id 4999306 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:28:31 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,298,1304319600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="551962144"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124])
  by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2011 10:27:56 -0700
Received: from [10.62.16.155] (cjwilson01-lxp.hq.netapp.com [10.62.16.155] (may be forged))
	by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id p4VHRuNt010694
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DE5251B.6060400@att.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:27:55 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
Reply-To: echristley@att.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [LML] Re: L-IV Choice of Engine
References: <list-4999293@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4999293@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kelly Troyer wrote:
> Mark and Group,
>        Come on group lets hear some other opinions from you about 
> alternative power-plants in general and our
> favorite in particular...............
>  

Your trying to get us to pick a mud-fight with a pig, Kelly.  These guys want to justify their decision.  The only 
response is, "Oh?  You couldn't do it, so that makes it either dangerous or impossible?  Even though there are dozens of 
examples of people doing just fine with their rotaries that didn't require $20K?", then walk away.  There is nothing 
else to be said.