X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm15.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.216] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with SMTP id 4995760 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 May 2011 22:40:38 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.237.216; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from [66.94.237.197] by nm15.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2011 02:40:02 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.122] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2011 02:40:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2011 02:40:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 601045.93860.bm@omp1027.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53286 invoked from network); 27 May 2011 02:40:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1306464002; bh=RWWfjvjTvXgPfnAI1HHLdkoMA13FtdH0MfTHPk9Vi/8=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PStnYrq2cn+imqEd0g4PpvaCHia2yxgWE3t+OeEIYMirLpKbiP8GAvw0KIutBxeU2yLvgGV2YZKIkIx4RxPdYZfNWNlWDUaFGXjF77e+qRGpKUq3BPojyV4thmyH+C5HuNCvWZVOTfffs13R4FVduPcB7QRvAGZEk/CmK1fmkIk= Received: from [192.168.1.2] (echristley@65.190.53.180 with plain) by smtp105.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 May 2011 19:40:01 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: 40RP3pGswBDvPav1a.I8eMv.KS8bdgWBnCloVoKaow-- X-YMail-OSG: 1u0ltSoVM1kzaUg_RmrPTzlFHx5IfoP51OaTsSH2sIceyNB hD.4i9ao4NQMn0_BKqSABZf_UyJ2T9_prmDCaVpe13ZV_ihe9FMiV677gOO3 tArUsSstsd5fYAIBWvGYKgaNCpprWsEMO2ngEcJvH_c5OUqX.wYFkjfXKqMR W5QrE8JS9Z95z69ihBOJcvm34WxZ7EgmHG52ZxkF6WDTyJNQ9RJdKI1xP_66 fDC3EBJzLehQZolEn6ZWK0YPnYkJ2aX60qUr0Nsa8voaGbWlUvnD_tSupAAO 097pXjQtMnSF0Ays_751rK7ZuCzECE6vSEBgHgvBePoXlahRVGg_Jd.MJdS_ ntkaZ046zG6hX1dBwoPUzmN3EEue37TKKH9XnJmZYNfPYBFnCuYNWDKKxtAh pE3Vh_LXZbCg7d1Fo5cKla82kO79dk9sY2kWU2.tvPwka7Rg_cA.4Xpt06wb W1mPjfUaKCnUmXbgOfhmxJmZmAmfECsf00HPb08N_rjKhZ8ypOJ5dbr0N3LH wSwhEbmSfkp56YccESZ.wAW_a3FRPomCs1UWiKtvNsnaBy1GLlvM9xNyfOGD xJsr4XQehuzuA78igaSEq2T0- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4DDF0EF5.90000@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:39:49 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower design References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 4Hp is what I was expecting to spend to get a 10% increase in pressure. That would give me between 15 and 20Hp. Does anyone here work on Volkswagens? They have a fan to cool the engine that looks like the shape I need, but I'm clueless as to the dimensions. Here is what I'm talking about: http://www.chircoestore.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=109_115_124&products_id=3295&osCsid=hclq20d2slrq1qh3eec132ii90 On 05/26/2011 07:25 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: > It probably takes 3 or 4 HP to produce the air pressure and volume that is > required for a turbo/super charger. At 12 or even 24 volts that is a lot of > continuous amps! > > When you want extra power, something is going to have to produce it and it > is not going to be free! > > It seems to me that the most economical for a plane is a turbo. Most of the > power to run it is currently going to waste. Not all the power, just most > and maybe most at that. But they can be problematic in a car and much more > so in a plane. > > I like Mark Steitle's solution much better. Get the power you need in a > more simple, less complicated manner. > > Bill B > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Tracy > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:23 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Blower design > > Except that turbocharger compressors run at over 50,000 rpm. Easy answers > are hard to come by. > > Tracy > > Sent from my iPad > > On May 26, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Roger Robertson > wrote: > >> On 5/26/2011 1:02 PM, Roger Robertson wrote: >> Probably the best solution is to hook a new high efficiency electric > motor to a large existing turbocharger in place of the exhaust system. > 10-15,000 rpm is no problem. I have a friend in the electric business that > is working on just that concept for his Lancair - only problem is, he's > overloaded at work. >> RRR >>> Charlie England wrote >> >> On 5/26/2011 8:39 AM, Ernest Christley wrote: >>> Charlie England wrote: >>> >>>> Not to rain too much on the parade of ideas, but I'd be fearful that > anything except a properly engineered blower assembly will consume more > power than it will add to the engine's output. Much better minds than mine > say that one of the reasons small turbines are so inefficient is excessive > leakage past the perimeter of the blades, due to the ratio of the gap area > to the overall area of the turbine. >>>> Charlie >>> That is the biggest hurdle to overcome. To overcome the problem the > shroud must fit VERY tightly. It's a much more complicated manufacturing > process, but a significant percentage of the blowers you will find have the > top-hat on the impeller blades. Effectively, they have a cast in shroud > with 0 clearance. That was the concept I was trying to tag onto with the > "thick cylinder with drilled holes" concept drawing. >>> -- >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >