Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #53883
From: Dustin Lobner <dmlobner@gmail.com>
Subject: [FlyRotary] - Day dreaming...
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:38:39 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Hi everyone,

I posted this today on the HomeBuiltAirplanes forum.  Going to C/P it here for comments/questions/flaming.

Background, I'm planning on building up a Renesis with a Turbonetics turbo, putting it into a Mustang II.  I'm planning on using MegaSquirt 3 (or whatever is available when I get there) ECUs.  These ECUs control things like waste gate management, any servos you want, in addition to the the EFI and ignition. 

So... <copy-paste from the forum>

The Renesis has 6 intake ports (I think a 4 port model was made for awhile, but I'm going to buy a crate engine so that's out). I found a white paper somewhere, written by the designers of the Renesis, talking about each port. There's the primary, which is always open. Secondary comes on 3,500-4K RPMs-ish. Aux turns on at 7.5K RPMs. The ECU I'll be using has outputs for controlling things like butterfly valves for different intake runners.

My understanding is that most people simply run on the pri/secondary only and plug the aux, or run with them all going. Seeing as how I'll have an ECU to do some work if I want, what do people think about valving either the aux or the secondary and aux? The ECU is flexible regarding mixtures and whatnot, so I'm thinking I could tune the "cruise" setting for 6K RPMs, aux closed, and then tune the "max power" setting for 7k RPMs with the butterfly opening at 6800 or something. Wastegate (should I go with a turbo) can vary by RPM too, so I could have it set for "normalize" 6800 and below, and "boost the heck out of it" above that.

*Shrugs* I know, it's an airplane, KISS. I have a few years before I'll be to the point of being able to wrench on the engine, so I'm dreaming about it now and hashing things out now so that when the engine gets here I can just build. From discussions on the Mazda list, different length runners DO matter quite a bit, so it's not like this is a completely worthless thought.

Thinking about it, valving the secondary seems a bit stupid, because if that valve breaks you don't have a good portion of your power, whereas if you lose the aux it's not the end of the world.

<end paste>

I guess what I'm going for is, I remember some conversation here about different length runners for different tuning.  This could let you have the best of both worlds...thoughts?  And mind you, I have a two engineer aviation minded friends, one with a ME/EE double and one with an AeroE, so I'm not completely without help designing this.

Dustin


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster