X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm14.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.52.211] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a) with SMTP id 4843998 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:01:55 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.52.211; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from [98.139.52.193] by nm14.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Feb 2011 19:01:21 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.162] by tm6.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Feb 2011 19:01:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1045.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Feb 2011 19:01:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 693807.38189.bm@omp1045.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 31459 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 19:01:21 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.1] (echristley@74.242.247.83 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com with SMTP; 09 Feb 2011 11:01:21 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: 40RP3pGswBDvPav1a.I8eMv.KS8bdgWBnCloVoKaow-- X-YMail-OSG: gSyafqgVM1kiCmz.EQotmisfP6vQsQq_GXvfyLNHDJ6MV2c noPTzpHi6fzkFNRb.zNcjOS2RxDWMdvirPwokWrK8ktVQx68mhYXkVUOG8XC cYNQlYryn5IARBnuYiuzT852T8t1jPQFLfvWArT4VnGTcyaJSuqu4YFGXlw1 aoxizO3.eHilRhN3BSxG2fb2w1WpcHJn1rpr3KNB4ACmMe87qmL29xOaxX.o E0KPHwBg1jNpEhaDu_HpPVALmmDnGdY88Pm9UjB4- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4D52E44B.7020803@nc.rr.com> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:00:27 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Replaced Tension Bolt, Oil Seal, Thrust Bearing ... back ... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030708030601000001080300" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030708030601000001080300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/09/2011 01:39 PM, Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > Send the entire energy department home. Established in 75 to eliminate > our dependence on offshore oil. > Eliminate all farm subsidies. Phase out oil imports to zero over the > next 7 years. Drill here. Drill now. > Now, Lynn, how are the politicians going to manipulate and control us if they do that? Next thing, you'll be asking for a simple and progressive tax system like the Fair Tax, which doesn't force every working American to become an accountant once a year. That being said, the Swift Fuel is not alcohol (from what I can tell). There are several way to derive fuel from organic stocks, the ethanol fermentation process just being one of the more familiar. Several are more efficient and produce better fuel, but lack the "I gave money to the Monsanto" benefit. The greenies are a bunch of liberal arts airheads, for the most part. I was helping out my son's middle-school "Future City" team. We were at a salvage yard, picking up materials. One of the kids picked up a chunk of metal and said, "That's heavy." I said, "That's because it is lead." He literally dropped it and started SCREAMING. He had been taught to equate lead with cyanide. That's the greeny perspective. They fill the cabinet of the worst President in American history. And that is why 100LL is going away. Lead or no, the typical high performance airplane still needs the octane, and no one has yet been able to produce a suitable replacement at a reasonable costs. I don't know if Swift fuel is the answer, but it seems promising. I fully expect the inventors cost estimation could be off by 50%. But who knows. He is at least demonstrating that the stuff works. --------------030708030601000001080300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 02/09/2011 01:39 PM, Lehanover@aol.com wrote:
Send the entire energy department home. Established in 75 to eliminate our dependence on offshore oil.
 
Eliminate all farm subsidies. Phase out oil imports to zero over the next 7 years. Drill here. Drill now.

Now, Lynn, how are the politicians going to manipulate and control us if they do that?  Next thing, you'll be asking for a simple and progressive tax system like the Fair Tax, which doesn't force every working American to become an accountant once a year.

That being said, the Swift Fuel is not alcohol (from what I can tell).  There are several way to derive fuel from organic stocks, the ethanol fermentation process just being one of the more familiar.  Several are more efficient and produce better fuel, but lack the "I gave money to the Monsanto" benefit.

The greenies are a bunch of liberal arts airheads, for the most part.  I was helping out my son's middle-school "Future City" team.  We were at a salvage yard, picking up materials.  One of the kids picked up a chunk of metal and said, "That's heavy."  I said, "That's because it is lead."  He literally dropped it and started SCREAMING.  He had been taught to equate lead with cyanide.  That's the greeny perspective.  They fill the cabinet of the worst President in American history.  And that is why 100LL is going away.

Lead or no, the typical high performance airplane still needs the octane, and no one has yet been able to produce a suitable replacement at a reasonable costs.  I don't know if Swift fuel is the answer, but it seems promising.  I fully expect the inventors cost estimation could be off by 50%.  But who knows.  He is at least demonstrating that the stuff works.
--------------030708030601000001080300--