X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.infosaic.com ([216.226.129.129] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTPS id 4487872 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:58:59 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.226.129.129; envelope-from=tmann@n200lz.com Received: by mail.infosaic.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:57:58 -0400 From: "Thomas Mann" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: re: [FlyRotary] Update: Loss of Oil Pressure Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:57:58 -0400 Reply-To: tmann@n200lz.com Message-ID: <63ea20b0$303dac7e$6326d2e5$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_6C042CA0.6837A2B7" X-Originating-IP: [63.76.170.2] This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_6C042CA0.6837A2B7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris, I'll look it up when I get home. Tracy mentions it in his book and it's in the Bruce T. Video. (most likely someone will come up with this in the meantime.) T Mann ---------------------------------------- From: "Chris Barber" Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:53 PM To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: SPAM-LOW: [FlyRotary] Update: Loss of Oil Pressure Nope. That particular EPA "fix" is not ringing a bell. However, the fact that it changed from what it was doing before is a significant concern. Do you know of where I may get more info on the retardation. Mine is a 2nd gen. Would not think that would be considered a later model. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Thomas Mann wrote: Hey Chris, I figure you've already covered this base but here goes: Now keep in mind I have not rebuilt my 20B yet but I have read where in the later models of the rotary, they retard the flow of oil until the temperature rises to an acceptable level as part of the measure Mazda took to satisfy the EPA requirements. Like I said, I'm sure you covered this base by overriding that mechanism, right? T Mann ------=_NextPart_000_0001_6C042CA0.6837A2B7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris,
I'll look it up when I get home. Tracy mentions it in his book and it's in = the Bruce T. Video.
(most likely someone will come up with this in the meantime.)

T Mann



From: "Chris Barber" <cbarber@texasattorney.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:53 PM
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net><= br /> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: SPAM-LOW: [FlyRotary] Update: Loss of Oil P= ressure


Nope. That particular EPA "fix" is not ringing a bell. However, the fa= ct that it changed from what it was doing before is a significant concern.&= nbsp;

Do you know of where I may get more info on the retardation. Mine is a= 2nd gen. Would not think that would be considered a later model. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Thomas Mann <tmann@n200lz.com> wrote:

Hey Chris,
I figure you've already covered this base but here goes:

Now keep in mind I have not rebuilt my 20B yet but I have read where in the= later models of the rotary, they retard the flow of oil until the temperat= ure rises to an acceptable level as part of the measure Mazda took to satis= fy the EPA requirements.

Like I said, I'm sure you covered this base by overriding that mechanism, r= ight?

T Mann


------=_NextPart_000_0001_6C042CA0.6837A2B7--