Return-Path: <finnlassen@netzero.net>
Received: from out002.verizon.net ([206.46.170.141] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2924958 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:55:50 -0500
Received: from netzero.net ([4.4.63.183]) by out002.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
          id <20040109165549.YHSH24265.out002.verizon.net@netzero.net>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:55:49 -0600
Message-ID: <3FFEDD0B.3000704@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:55:39 -0500
From: Finn Lassen <finnlassen@netzero.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Series vs parralel rads
References: <list-2923996@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2923996@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out002.verizon.net from [4.4.63.183] at Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:55:49 -0600

Lynn, what would be a good source for

"formed 90 degree silicone hose segments"?

Any NAPA or AutoZone part numbers?

I'm looking for 3/4" ID 45 and 90 degree bends.
Actually 3/4" ID 90 degree, and 3/4" to 5/8" ID 45 degree.

Finn

Lehanover@aol.com wrote:

>If there is going to be a difference in effectiveness between the two 
>systems, it probably isn't more that one or two percent. So the first thing that 
>comes to mind is which one is lighter. Series wins. I would use 3/4" or 1" ID hose 
>to hook it up. I would use formed 90 degree silicone hose segments and two 
>hose clamps at each junction. So you save time and money on the installation, to 
>spend on the ducting to the cores which is more important anyway.
>
>Lynn E. Hanover
>  
>