(thinking out
loud)
If one was to have large hoses with low
restriction upstream of the cores, and then put restrictors of the same size
and shape at the outlet of each of the cores, I wonder if the flows would be
close to equal. As long as the most restrictive (highest flow velocity) point
is carefully controlled at the exit of the core, I would think that the
relative flows could be closely controlled by adjusting the shape & size of
each of the restrictors. As long as
the Cores were relatively close in flow-rates I would imagine that the amount
of restriction required at the exits would be minimal.
Just a theory (anyone care to give it a
spin? – or have they already?),
Cheers,
Pete
Europa builder and single rotor dreamer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Kruiswyk
[mailto:neilak@rogers.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:53 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Series vs
parralel rads
Ed,
You
can put me down for series rads and Jim M as well. Neither one of us could get the coolant
to flow equally through parallel rads. Jim went so far as to add ball valves on
the hot core to try and limit it’s flow. It worked to a degree but plumbing got
very heavy and complicated.
I’ve
pondered about this issue and I think there may be a number of factors
involved. (Group input is highly
desired) We both used large hoses
for our installations. 1.5”
to the Y’s and 1” from the Y’s to the rads. (Actually, one of us used Y’s and
the other T’s). I’m
wondering if the large hoses after the Y was too little flow resistance thereby
allowing most of the coolant to pass through one rad. I notice Tracey uses smaller hoses which
may increase flow resistance to each rad and provide more of a balance. I think someone is using AN16 fittings
which is 1” hose but by the time you get through the restrictive male
coupling, the same factors may apply.
Al
G. may be able to help me with this one… Assuming a perfect world… what would the outlet temperature
difference be between series rads vs, parallel. My guess is… if we had 215 degrees coolant entering
the parallel rads and we get 180 degrees leaving the rads, there is a 35 degree
drop, or about a 16.3% drop. Series
rads would give a similar % drop divided by 2 for each. 215 – 8% = 199. Then the second rad sees 199 – 8%
= 184 (I rounded off the numbers
cuz 1 degree isn’t an issue)
By my calculation (which may be out in left field) the difference is
negligible.
Neil (Giving Rusty something
else to think about)
?