Return-Path: Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2921186 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:25:01 -0500 Received: from [68.211.141.95] by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040107152500.VUEW1950.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.211.141.95]> for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:25:00 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:24:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RX-8 CAS From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit That was my first choice, but my front housing does not have the mounting studs, unless I make a special bracket for the sensors? Tracy thinks that RX-8 sensor is better solution. Bulent Bu On 1/7/04 9:26 AM, "cardmarc@charter.net" wrote: > You might want to look at an FD (third gen) 1993-95 in usa type. It is a dual > magnetic sensor (two tubes mounted in tandem on two screw posts on front > cover) mated with a pulley with trigger fingers on it. I don't know about the > rx8 but the late model rx7s had them. >> >> From: Bulent Aliev >> Date: 2004/01/07 Wed AM 07:17:29 EST >> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >> Subject: [FlyRotary] RX-8 CAS >> >> Does anybody have a picture of RX-8 crank angle sensor and how I can get >> one? >>