Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #50939
From: <Bktrub@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: cooling for ground runs
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:49:45 EDT
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
I think that it's not the best use of time trying to build a firewall forward package for any particular plane if one is looking at producing a large number of engines for sale. A better approach would be to build the lightest, most reliably powerful rotary with a 2.85 redrive and then let others adapt it to their planes. Look at rotax- they don't build firewall forward packages, they have a great engine in it's weight and power range and the plane makers are doing the rest.
 
What were the original powersport superlight engines? 13B p-port, with the oil pan mounting flanges cut off, aluminum side housings, mounted with the exhaust side down? I'm sure there's more to them than that, but I think that's what they were, basically.
 
II would have liked to see Powersport make just the engines- forget the whole package- if the engine is light, powerful, and reliable, then homebuilders will do the rest.
 
 
Just my two cents.
 
Brian Trubee
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster