Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2910653 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:11:30 -0500 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id hBUEBPHH005733 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:11:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000701c3cede$60512ca0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Throttle Body Position and EDDIE Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:08:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Hi Rusty, Been thinking about your question of throttle body position and the EDDIE. I've come to the conclusion that with at Throttle body inserted in the pulse path that at WOT there would be mimimal effect, however, if you planned to cruise (part throttle) and expect any improved milage from the increase volumetric effiiciency of the DIE then I think that might not pan out. The partially closed butterfly plates would probably have an adverse impact on the pulse (would reflect a lot of energy back). However, since most of us would probably want the extra HP from EDDIE when we really need it such as WOT for take off or WOT speed runs, this probably would not be much of a consideration. But, thought I would mention it. In fact, I have an 4 injector TWM webber throttle body that I might consider doing that with. Depends on whether having a throttle cable running to the throttle body on the plenum adversly affects the ability of my adjustable manifold to move up and down. Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com