|
Dennis,
What was the length - do you remember.
George (down under)
Bill,
It's
been over a year since I studied the Renesis intake but this is what I
remember.
The lowest rotary valve in the Renesis intake shuts off the
secondarie intakes at low rpm. It is full open for high rpms. The next
rotary valve connects the combined primary and secondary intakes from rotor
#1 to the primary and secondary's of rotor #2 at high rpms. With the
engine running at high rpm and with both valves open the DIE can work.
The DIE path length is from one rotor intake valve (at the rotor face)
up to and thru the second or upper rotating valve (in the open position) and
back down the other intake tube to the other rotor valve face.
Hope
this makes sence!
Dennis H.
Bryan Winberry wrote:
Yes George, I was
referring to the Renesis manifold. Specifically though, I was talking
about the valve that produces the D.I.E. effect.
What a terrible
acronym.
BW
From:
Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of George
Lendich
Sent: Tuesday,
February 16, 2010 4:28 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power
was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
I'm hearing
you, I guess you mean the Renesis manifold. Maybe someone can duplicate that
in carbon fiber, in a more compact form. I know - another job for Bill
Jepson.
George,
It’s a shame that
the stock intake that does all this using a valve, can’t be used in our
application.
Bryan
From:
Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of George
Lendich
Sent: Tuesday,
February 16, 2010 3:54 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs Power
was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to turbo
I missed
where the 43" came from, however from my calculations for 44mm inlet tube,
my calculations came to 21.36". That's for a straight tube inlet manifold.
That's interesting isn't it.
This is hard
for me to visualize as well. Perhaps if you get a chance, you
could snap a picture from the top.
Did you get 43
in. from #1 secondary to #2 secondary?
Bryan
From:
Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of Bill
Bradburry
Sent: Monday,
February 15, 2010 11:29 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to
turbo
Dennis,
I just looked at your picture again…the
secondary look much longer than the primaries. It may be an
optical illusion??? I bet you mean 1 1/8
id??
Bill B
From:
Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of Dennis
Haverlah
Sent: Monday,
February 15, 2010 11:03 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rpm vs
Power was : Throttle limits was Re: N.A. Renesis to
turbo
All my tubes are the same length and the same
diameters. I can check but I think they were 1 1/4 id. and 1 1/4
od.
Bill Bradburry wrote:
Dennis,
Aren’t your primary and secondary tubes
different lengths from rotor face to rotor face? If so, what
are the two lengths? Are they different
diameters?
Bill B
|