Ed & Bill,
If I understand correctly from discussion
with Tracy, the default value of 128 for a MAP table value is what you would
read directly from the data stream. The 128 is reported as zero on the
EM3 with positive values indicating enrichment and negative values indicating
leaning. Values of zero on the EM3 are values which have not been changed
from the default.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009
4:49 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Stoich
A/F Ratio?? : [FlyRotary] Re: where's the missing power?
Ok, I understand now
Bill. I think Al answered your question on how far from 14.7:1 to 9:1 on
his controller of his 3 rotor – That’s the only information I am
aware of about how much twisting of the manual mixture control it may take.
I can simply state that with the mixture Knob at 3:00 its too much fuel for my
N/A turbo block – so I would say Al’s information sounds reasonable
to me.
Unless Tracy has really
changed things with the EC3, there are NO manifold pressure values in any bins
(columns of the table) – the manifold pressure (when used) is converted
into a “bin” pointer which points to the appropriate bin
(numbered from 0 – 128) for that corresponding manifold pressure).
That “bin” selected by the manifold pressure value of the engine
then contains a fuel factor value represented by the value (height) of the bar
in that bin. I believe Tracy’s default value is 128 which
theoretically would give a 14.7:1 air/fuel ratio. Going above that value
enriches the mixture and below leans it.
IF there are zeros
for the values of any of the bins then that says there is no Map
correction Table (MCT) correction factor used for that bin. . So if the
values of zero are valid, I would assume that for those regions the fuel
needed must be derived solely from some other parameter – like RPM with
the manifold pressure value only acting as a switch (above below 13Hg for
example)
But, if that is indeed
the case then I’m still a bit surprised there are no MCT values for
rpm.
There is the possibility
that somehow the MCT values for those bins were set to zero accidentally, but
as you so rightly surmised, only Tracy can answer the question you have.
Ed