Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #48703
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Dyson Fan
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:41:12 -0400
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Ok, you’ve convinced me, Lynn.  Now how do I go about scaling that dyson circle so I can get 15 times the airflow through my cowl.  Never doubted that venture effect would move air and exhaust augmentation does essentially the same.  But, must confess I never would have guessed you get 15 more out of it than you put in.  I mean that’s pretty dog gone good.


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Lynn Hanover
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:42 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Dyson Fan

 

 Now the real question is how this fan induced flow  is capable of inducting a 15 time greater flow of air.  The principal would appear to be the same as exhaust augmentation with a lot less energy.  So don’t see any deifying of the laws of physics so far.

 But,  if it works for the dyson fan, then why not get 15 times {:>) your current cooling air flow sitting on the ground with your engine running?:

 

 

 

Look at venturi and eductors. Used in moving huge amounts of fuel and water back and forth in ships to maintain trim using a small amount of the fluid at very high velocity. See also, jet pumps. The augmentor tubes in aircraft use a similar (venturi) principal. Nothing to see here.................move along. 1900s technology.

 

The magic is the application. I own one of the few remaining fans designed by Jim Bede. Several ring shaped guide vanes. Very effective.

 

The Dyson is neat but not $300 plus dollars neat. Like his $500 dollar vacuum cleaner????

 

Lynn E. Hanover

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster