X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com ([209.85.220.213] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3887377 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:42:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.213; envelope-from=lehanover@gmail.com Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1730209fxm.1 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:41:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ldaXF4Eowsn+3ojBivg6ECzPUZmzKGYXCjKcyQ+Z3WY=; b=H8iSkznc0v/wxQhaReyBCX6vMGPrJKsLQ0003oLNmpPYF+/t2Qfgee8yMqPLg+fcHS E+4QjwUSFOEE5qxYKAYDeNE2FrAq78hdvBo01YrvlJ69nd4zvWEPUj5IqTtfmYc844zR 2SjVWw6PGoIAz1+X7UaUbuxZjKdi2EcnZ/oe8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Th2st3lvUhQ1vYqVeVoWpbCyAWRAMvLB8b0+fZojkWsikPY+tmO/AS6hZ3Xrk6uG1/ pIDZtjvvO+oIIRrzdPTVffLXXcxrrv4Xa7XqoPyMw5xjc6dx5dBLmJp5BMmp+8ti33U/ qsDnEzAGDMp36N7GcuePmw0Sbg6MMdugxMxIc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.3 with SMTP id u3mr495610bkw.179.1255646500117; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:41:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1ab24f410910151541p6e04af4eq54181a2cb652947c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Dyson Fan From: Lynn Hanover To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd5249a5c38047600fb16 --0015175cd5249a5c38047600fb16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Now the real question is how this fan induced flow is capable of inductin= g a 15 time greater flow of air. The principal would appear to be the same a= s exhaust augmentation with a lot less energy. So don=92t see any deifying o= f the laws of physics so far. But, if it works for the dyson fan, then why not get 15 times {:>) your current cooling air flow sitting on the ground with your engine running?: Look at venturi and eductors. Used in moving huge amounts of fuel and water back and forth in ships to maintain trim using a small amount of the fluid at very high velocity. See also, jet pumps. The augmentor tubes in aircraft use a similar (venturi) principal. Nothing to see here.................move along. 1900s technology. The magic is the application. I own one of the few remaining fans designed by Jim Bede. Several ring shaped guide vanes. Very effective. The Dyson is neat but not $300 plus dollars neat. Like his $500 dollar vacuum cleaner???? Lynn E. Hanover --0015175cd5249a5c38047600fb16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0Now the real question is how this fan induced fl= ow =A0is capable of inducting a 15 time greater flow of air.=A0 The princip= al would appear to be the same as exhaust augmentation with a lot less ener= gy. =A0So don=92t see any deifying of the laws of physics so far.=20

=A0But, =A0if= it works for the dyson fan, then why not get 15 times {:>) your current= cooling air flow sitting on the ground with your engine running?:
=A0
=A0
=A0
Look at ventu= ri and eductors. Used in moving huge amounts of fuel and water back and for= th in ships to maintain trim using a small amount of the fluid at very high= velocity. See also, jet pumps. The augmentor tubes in aircraft use a simil= ar (venturi) principal. Nothing to see here.................move along. 190= 0s technology.
=A0
The magic is = the application. I own one of the few remaining fans designed by Jim Bede. = Several ring shaped guide vanes. Very effective.
=A0
The Dyson is = neat but not $300 plus dollars neat. Like=A0his $500 dollar vacuum cleaner?= ???
=A0
Lynn E. Hanov= er
--0015175cd5249a5c38047600fb16--