You may have hit on the reason..............With the 2.17 redrive you may be limited by the
prop...........Let us say you are seeing 5500 rpm at speed............At that rpm you are only
able to develop xxx hp and your prop is absorbing it even though you are only at 3/4's of
your throttle travel............Now let us say you now have the 2.85 redrive and now seeing
6500 rpm and the resulting xxx+ hp is also absorbed by your prop but you are now able
see the extra power at full throttle.............Just a "WAG" on my part...............
-------------- Original message from "Mike Wills" <rv-4mike@cox.net>: --------------
Bill/all,
Thanks for the feedback. Most of your comments line up with my understanding/thoughts. I didnt go into installation details when I wrote this for a couple of reasons. One, I've said it before, and two, many of the details now are pretty vague because my exhaust and intake systems came together about 6 years ago. I'll recount what I recall:
1) The engine is a Bruce Turrentine built. Turbo housings and high compression NA rotors. No porting.
2) The exhaust is a true 2 - 1 header with equal length primaries. I'm a little sketchy on dimensions but my recall is 1 3/4" primaries, 32" long and equal length into a Burns merge collector 2 1/2". Muffler is 4" behind the collector, 2 1/2" inlet and outlet, 28" long, 4 1/2" diameter. It's a spiral flow design, homebuilt, with a relatively large straight tube through the middle. I dont believe it presents any significant restriction. Internals are Inconel and it was in good shape when I had it off the airplane a couple of weeks ago.
3) The intake starts with a modified 88 Mazda NA lower manifold with all the excess metal cut away and port matched to the turbo housings (blended with JB Weld). I used the first part of the upper manifold to make the 90 degree bend over the top of the engine and from there welded on aluminum tubes (1 1/4" primaries, 1 1/2" secondaries, about 10" long. Plenum at the end of the tubes is small. Hard to describe so I'll try to find a picture. The throttle body is as described previously - a hacked Mazda tb with only 2 of the 3 original inlets.
I guess what really shocked me is how much throttle was still remaining when I reached max power. I guess the real question is, is my prop load limiting power output, is there some dip in the power curve and my engine cant push the prop load "over the hump", or is it simply a matter of a restriction in the system somewhere that is limiting the airflow? As I said previously, I'm not too worried about it because the airplane performance is pretty good. But who doesnt want more, especially if you suspect its there and accessible with hopefully not too much effort?
Mike
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 11:14 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: where's the missing power?
Mike,
There are several reasons that an engine will produce max power at "less" than full throttle. First, and this can sometimes be hard to check, be sure that your full throttle position doesn't rotate the throttle plate past full open. I've seen this several times in butterfly throttle systems. If you are using a Mazda throttle body it is likely that the wide open position is controlled with a stop. You shouldn't have a over rotation problem with that. The second reason, and far more common, is that the design has more intake than it can use with the tuning or RPM that the prop limits it to. This isn't really a problem other than indicating that with development the engine could make more power. Often with the design constraints placed on us by a close fitting cowling or restrictive exhaust limit the best airflow to less than the throttle body can pass. The engine just can't "breathe" well enough to need a larger opening. The length of the intake or exhaust can be too long/short and the maximum amount of air that the engine can digest will be at the 3/4 throttle area or even less. Most engines can be tuned to best performance at a specific length inlet and the diameter is also important. Same with the exhaust. If either system is off a significant amount it can prevent you from making any more power past a given throttle opening. This won't hurt the engine at all, it just shows you that some portion of the system can be improved. If your exhaust gas temperature is correct then the injection is working properly and you need to check the other systems. Be sure to double check your exhaust for obstructions or a pipe collapse. We have had too many exhaust problems lately. To put your self at ease remember this, most modern diesels have NO throttle plate. The speed of the engine is completely controlled by the amount of fuel injected. This helps the efficiency at maximum throttle, but obviously there is more air than the engine can use at low speeds. A small amount of fuel is injected, compression ignited ,and all burns up. If all is healthy your engine is drawing all the air you can use by half throttle. You can probably make improvements and get more power or lower fuel burn by tuning.
Bill Jepson
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Wills <rv-4mike@cox.net>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sat, Oct 10, 2009 8:27 pm
Subject: [FlyRotary] where's the missing power?
I noticed quite a while ago and have mentioned several times here that my engine does not have a linear response to throttle. It reaches its max power before it reaches fully open throttle. I havent worried too much about this up until now because the airplane has sufficient power as is, has slightly better performance than my previous 160HP Lyc powered -6A, and my wood prop is actually a pretty good match for the current power level.
But I would like to understand what's going on here and eventually address it. I was flying yesterday, my usual boring holes in the sky directly over the airport. Decided to investigate just a little so leveled at 5,000 feet at full throttle. Started reducing throttle until I noticed a slight reduction in RPM and fuel flow. Then looked down at where the throttle was actually set and was shocked to see it slightly below half open. I dont have a regular manifold pressure gauge, just an industrial type vacuum gauge ( I really gotta get an MP gauge). Anyway, the vacuum gauge was indicating 4" of vacuum.
So I suspect I am giving up a substantial amount of HP. I think the most likely suspect is my throttle body. For a throttle body I copied Tracy's original design. Started with a stock late 80s Mazda TB and hacked off the third port and all of the extra stuff. The cowl in this area is very tight and I am unable to install any sort of air filter or any sort of bell mouth on the TB. And I'm sure the cowl's close proximity to the TB influences airflow into it as well.
Any comments on this or ways to test it are welcome.
Mike Wills
RV-4 N144MW