X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3861059 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:40:39 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.39; envelope-from=glasair2@me.com Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20090921154004.CUJJ21470.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:40:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.201] ([70.177.24.126]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id jTg21c00K2jEC4N04Tg2dU; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:40:03 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=pFm1DC4Pu-kA:10 a=HHGDD-5mAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=7Vf42Ctr2QB98Jk7VCsA:9 a=Q7ni_ePtP4-xzCBR4zaZ62bPdL4A:4 a=i1zE5R4R5dEA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=Xs4rem6vGrHxwlxAEukA:9 a=eSVetGhyt3pWip6XLtgA:7 a=Ne9Obsb26rM5aUbkjpi8P7qWpKwA:4 X-CM-Score: 0.00 From: Steve Thomas Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-28-362495923 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: nothing to report... Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:40:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: Rotary motors in aircraft References: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) --Apple-Mail-28-362495923 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Is there anyone out there with a Lightspeed Zulu that can report on its effectiveness? Best Regards, Steve Thomas _______________________________________________________ On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Mark Steitle wrote: > Lightspeed 33G. > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Steve Thomas wrote: > Mark, > > Which ANR do you use? > > Best Regards, > > Steve Thomas > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Mark Steitle wrote: > >> Good report Mike. I know what you mean about a quieter muffler. >> My ANR headset does a good job of killing the low frequencies, but >> a poor job on the higher frequencies. The rotary has both. So >> take your pick, turn the ANR on and listen to the high frequencies, >> or turn it off and listen to the low rumble. If I could only find >> an ANR that can do both I would be a happy camper. >> >> Mark >> >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Mike Wills >> wrote: >> I added another 1.3 hours to my total flight time today. And for >> the first time I landed and was completely satisfied with the >> flight. I'd still like to quiet it down a little, but this was the >> first flight where I didnt feel like there was anything that had to >> be fixed before the next flight. Even the landing was pretty decent. >> >> I've got just over 9 hours of flight time and about 40 hours of >> engine run time now. So far all of my flight time has been directly >> over the airport because to venture away requires flying over about >> 50 miles of mostly unlandable mountainous terrain. But I'm starting >> to think seriously about stretching the legs a little... >> >> Mike Wills >> RV-4 N144MW >> > > --Apple-Mail-28-362495923 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Is = there anyone out there with a Lightspeed Zulu that can report on its = effectiveness?

Best Regards,

Steve = Thomas




=

On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Mark Steitle wrote:

Lightspeed 33G.


 
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Steve Thomas = <glasair2@me.com> = wrote:
Mark,=20

Which ANR do you use?

Best Regards,

Steve Thomas
_______________________________________________________

=



=

On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Mark Steitle wrote:

Good report Mike.  I know what you mean about a quieter = muffler.  My ANR headset does a good job of killing the low = frequencies, but a poor job on the higher frequencies.  The rotary = has both.  So take your pick, turn the ANR on and listen = to the high frequencies, or turn it off and listen to the low = rumble.  If I could only find an ANR that can do both I would be a = happy camper. 
 
Mark

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Mike Wills = <rv-4mike@cox.net> wrote:
I added another 1.3 hours to my = total flight time today. And for the first time I landed and was = completely satisfied with the flight. I'd still like to quiet it down a = little, but this was the first flight where I didnt feel like there was = anything that had to be fixed before the next flight. Even the landing = was pretty decent.
 
I've got just over 9 hours of = flight time and about 40 hours of engine run time now. So far all = of my flight time has been directly over the airport because to venture = away requires flying over about 50 miles of mostly unlandable = mountainous terrain. But I'm starting to think seriously about = stretching the legs a little...
 
Mike Wills
RV-4 = N144MW

=


= --Apple-Mail-28-362495923--