Message-ID: <001101c3c72f$e80c0cc0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2898661@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:31:33 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: evap core versus radiator


> Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" <sqpilot@earthlink.net>:
>
>   Hi again, Ed.  Thank you very much for going into the details of my
> cooling system. My SQ2000 is a fairly fast aircraft. Normal climb speeds
are
> between 120 and 140 mph.  George Graham has a 13b powered side-by-side E
> Racer, which has a similar profile to mine, and he said that he takes off
> and climbs at 1/2 throttle. That statement, plus your input, makes me more
> comfortable that this radiator will work for me. I am more concerned about
> having a radiator that will cool my engine in cruise configuration, as
> that's where I will be spending 95% of my time flying.  If necessary, I
can
> always climb in "steps", allowing the engine to cool before resuming
climb.
> The 16x10 radiator will make for a very neat, compact, and easy to duct
> installation.  Thanks again for all of the time you have spent figuring
out
> the cooling capabilities for me.  Hope I can return the favor somehow in
the
> future.  Paul Conner, Mobile, AL
>

Sounds like it should work in your application, Paul.  There is no question
in my mind (and calculations ) that size radiator will easily cool you at
Cruise even with 160HP.  My pleasure, trying to help figure this all out
forces me to do some research and head scratching which keeps the old
neurons refreshed {:>)

Just get in the air safely and that will be return enough.

Ed Anderson