X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3857539 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:07 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.45; envelope-from=glasair2@me.com Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20090917173333.WEMY16492.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:33:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.201] ([70.177.24.126]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id htZX1c00E2jEC4N04tZXUY; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:33:31 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=igMtR8_8c7AA:10 a=ifjp9LhxAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=8pif782wAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=8irbiDKtarBJZMDziE4A:9 a=QUEpaTasO06PVD4soCoA:7 a=l9gbLjzjsGibo7S-c9vWPwHR81AA:4 a=IyjHnbS7-ncA:10 a=kWSo6NaF3wcA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vinyl Ester tanks From: Steve Thomas In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:33:31 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) Alain, What engine are you running? I will mention you the next time I talk to him. Best Regards, Steve Thomas _______________________________________________________ On Sep 17, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Alain Ouellet wrote: > Steve, > > If your fellow is interested to have someone test his fuel in > operation. > > I could probably arrange to have it done, let me know and/or he can > contact > me > thru a direct e-mail and we can go from there. > > Best Regards, > > Alain > > Alain Ouellet > 905-458-5424 > mailto:aouellet@icecanada.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > Behalf Of Steve Thomas > Sent: September 17, 2009 9:51 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vinyl Ester tanks > > > George, > > According to the information I have, butanol is not corrosive due to > its larger hydrocarbon chain. Check out the following link: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butanol_fuel > > I recently spoke with a fellow that is trying to develop a biobutanol > factory to produce it from biomass, mostly waste product and not > foodstuffs. He wants me to test his fuel. Not likely, as flying for > the first time has enough uncertainty without adding unnecessary > variables. But, it does have promise. > > Best Regards, > > Steve Thomas > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:42 AM, George Lendich wrote: > >> Steve doesn't it go Methanol, Ethanol, Butanol in the BTU rating - >> isn't it still a alcohol and isn't alcohol the thing that kills >> epoxy? >> George ( down under) >> >>> (sorry, but the chart mentioned below is too big. If you want a >>> copy, let me know and I'll email direct.) >>> >>> Yes, but there are many formulations of vinyl ester. My entire >>> airplane is made from vinyl ester, including the wet-wing gas >>> tanks. The formula used from the factory was Derakane 411-45. I >>> switched to Derakane 411-350 some time later as it was a little >>> more viscous and wetted out better. It was also easier to get. >>> However, if you look at the attached Derakane Chemical Resistance >>> Guide, the 411 series is not recommended for gasohol >>> concentrations greater than 10% ethanol. Since I cannot do >>> anything about my tanks at this point, I am forced to live with >>> the limitations of Derakane 411. >>> >>> I don't know what the specifications are on the fiberglast resins, >>> but those who use it ought to know. For me, E85 is clearly not in >>> the cards. Another possible option is butanol. There are some who >>> are experimenting with butanol as a 100% replacement for 100LL. >>> It has nearly the same octane rating as 100LL, and about 90% of >>> the total energy, per gallon, of gasoline. Ethanol only has about >>> 60% of the energy, per gallon, of gasoline. And butanol does >>> require a different air-fuel ratio. It is also not corrosive in >>> the same way as ethanol. >>> >>> So, my concern remains. It looks like using gasohol with a 10% >>> lace of ethanol will be OK. More than that, I'll be switching to >>> 100LL. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Steve Thomas >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Lynn Hanover wrote: >>> >>>> Or, what are the tanks holding E-85 made out of? About 75% alcohol >>>> .All of the underground fuel tanks are now Vinyl Ester. >>>> >>>> Lynn E. Hanover >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html