X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3857127 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:37 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (sv1-1.per.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.68]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115671737AB for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:42:00 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C411BEC036 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:41:59 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <1626633401484900848AFC6B6978A813@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vinyl Ester tanks Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:42:04 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090916-0, 09/16/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Steve doesn't it go Methanol, Ethanol, Butanol in the BTU rating - isn't it still a alcohol and isn't alcohol the thing that kills epoxy? George ( down under) > (sorry, but the chart mentioned below is too big. If you want a copy, > let me know and I'll email direct.) > > Yes, but there are many formulations of vinyl ester. My entire airplane > is made from vinyl ester, including the wet-wing gas tanks. The formula > used from the factory was Derakane 411-45. I switched to Derakane > 411-350 some time later as it was a little more viscous and wetted out > better. It was also easier to get. However, if you look at the attached > Derakane Chemical Resistance Guide, the 411 series is not recommended for > gasohol concentrations greater than 10% ethanol. Since I cannot do > anything about my tanks at this point, I am forced to live with the > limitations of Derakane 411. > > I don't know what the specifications are on the fiberglast resins, but > those who use it ought to know. For me, E85 is clearly not in the cards. > Another possible option is butanol. There are some who are experimenting > with butanol as a 100% replacement for 100LL. It has nearly the same > octane rating as 100LL, and about 90% of the total energy, per gallon, of > gasoline. Ethanol only has about 60% of the energy, per gallon, of > gasoline. And butanol does require a different air-fuel ratio. It is > also not corrosive in the same way as ethanol. > > So, my concern remains. It looks like using gasohol with a 10% lace of > ethanol will be OK. More than that, I'll be switching to 100LL. > > Best Regards, > > Steve Thomas > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > On Sep 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Lynn Hanover wrote: > >> Or, what are the tanks holding E-85 made out of? About 75% alcohol >> .All of the underground fuel tanks are now Vinyl Ester. >> >> Lynn E. Hanover > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >