Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0)
  with HTTP id 1849065 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:25:42 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: interesting discussion on intake temp
  andfueldelivery.
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:25:42 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1849065@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DC0A3D7.883247FC@starband.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Jim Sower <canarder@starband.net>:
<... B controller ... backup only.  The temp sensor ... not used to eliminate
another source of failure ...>
That makes perfect sense.  Seems as though the programming would be entirely
different from the A side though.  Or do you program MAP and RPM the same and
put in a constant for Temp on the B side?
It is getting clearer though .... Jim S.
PS  my (a) reason for wanting turbocharge should have read *noise* suppression
...

Tracy Crook wrote: