Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #46897
From: Al Wick <alwick@juno.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Corruption of EC settings
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:05:58 -0700
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
>And the price is ?
I don't know. I think it's (vi-pec V88) in the $2k range.
 
>I read over the specs and did not see any redundancy  listed for the ViPec-88 – did I miss it? 
It's not redundant. I'm using two for redundancy. Keeping in mind that redundancy has value only when the two devices have independent failure modes....no components in common, no common failure modes. If I were using oem ECU's, which have extreme robust design (not affected by electrical noise for example), I would not bother to have redundant ECU's. I keep finding significant design oversights with custom ecu's. Poor handling of sensor errors, sensitive to noise, etc. So I use two. Fwiw.
 
-al wick
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 3:00 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Corruption of EC settings

 
George (down under)
I've installed Megasquirt, Haltech, and now Vi-Pec ECU's (not rotary installs). Most impressed with the Vi-Pec so far. The others had various issues.
 
Vi-Pec V88 is highly flexible. No special wiring for various injectors. Lot's of extra sensors and outputs available. One of the few to be able to handle unusual crank signals (not applicable to rotary). Very good documentation, the others were fair at best. I have two on my plane for genuine redundancy. I'd give it strong consideration. Guess I'd describe it as sophisticated, robust, yet friendly.
 
FWIW
 
-al wick
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 11:19 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Corruption of EC settings

Al Gietzen wrote:
>
> Al,
>
> Do you know of any alternatives out there now that might be worth a look?
>
> Bryan
>
> Preparing to commit $$$ to EC
>
> Bryan;
>
> I haven’t looked any further since prior to the final stages of
> getting my EC2 working. The basic issue (besides cost) is always that
> the systems are set up for automotive use, and although they may be
> noise tolerant, have complexities that make them awkward for aviation
> use. And there is the issue of redundancy. Tracy had good reason for
> developing his own.
>
> Al
>
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster