X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3688967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:07:21 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (sv1-1.per.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.68]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032D71737C4 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:06:43 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id A35A41153647 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:06:40 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <08BA1FE0593E4290B174B5C39FEB0C15@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 295cc vs 495 cc was [FlyRotary] responses to responses, not developing full power Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:06:39 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090618-0, 06/18/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Ed I did the figurers again and 400 x 4 supports 245 hp at 79%Duty Cycle; 4 x 440 at 71.5% DC; and 2 x 550 at 57.5 % DC. The yellow injectors are between 78 DC( at best) and 88.5% (at worst). So I have to agree with you and Tracy! George(down under) > Somewhere in that ball park, George. I think between 440 -550 cc/min or > the > stock N/A engine injectors is what the Ec2 was designed for. Tracy added > some features such as mode 6 to accommodate those who wanted to use > different size injectors (within a limit). > > Smaller injectors can make a smoother idle for a car as they more finely > control fuel flow at lower rpm, however, few that I am aware of idle their > aircraft engines below 1200 rpm. Both Tracy and I idle our older 13Bs at > around 1800-2000 rpm. So that benefit of a smaller injectors is rather > lost > to our use. > > Plus a larger primary injector gives you that back up capability of > running > on only one pair of injectors, only one size and type of injector to order > or keep a spare on hand and little need to mess with Mode 6 a some of the > advantages I see. > > But, part of this "hobby" is doing it "your way" - so certainly no problem > seeing folks opt for smaller primary injectors, just not my personal > preference. > > Ed > > > Ed Anderson > > Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered > > Matthews, NC > > eanderson@carolina.rr.com > > http://www.andersonee.com > > http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html > > http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW > > http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of George Lendich > Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 5:44 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 295cc vs 495 cc was [FlyRotary] responses to > responses, not developing full power > > Ed, > 295cc + 495cc = 795cc, why not a couple of 400cc injectors as the figures > suggest, what is the closest to 400cc injectors- is it the 440cc Tracy > recommends? > > The engine won't be going over 7,200 rpm for most applications and the > 495cc secondary Renesis is larger than our needs. I know larger is better > for the higher RPM as it dispenses larger amounts of fuel over a shorter > time, however for idle and low power their getting too big. > > So I figure for the situation of having them the same size, I wouldn't > have > them bigger than the 440cc Tracy recommends. > George (down under) > >> Don, if you are using stock Renesis (295 cc primary/495 cc secondary), >> then >> I am not surprised you find the running rough when switching to just the >> secondary. Here is why. >> >> Once you tune the EC2 to idle/low rpm - you are doing it before the EC2 >> stages, therefore the Ec2 is opening only the 295cc primary injectors and >> you have tuned your engine (presumably) to run well at idle on the >> primary >> injectors. When you switch the primary injectors off and secondary >> injectors on - the EC2 is still providing the same pulse duration >> (assuming >> engine manifold pressure, etc are the same) for the almost twice as large >> secondary injectors as it did for the smaller primary injectors. Ergo, >> you >> are feeding the engine almost twice the fuel (for the same engine >> conditions) as you did when on the primary injectors. The engine is >> choking >> on too much fuel. >> >> Those of use with the older 13Bs which basically had the same size >> injectors >> in primary and secondary roles OR those using the Renesis who have >> replaced >> the smaller 295 cc with the larger size secondary (which once again means >> having same size injectors in both positions) can switch from primary to >> secondary as the pulse duration is injecting essentially the same amount >> of >> fuel regardless of which pair you have turned on. >> >> Since Many of us have found that the 13B will produce almost full power >> on > >> a >> single pair of 460/550 cc/min injectors - I personally favor replacing >> the >> smaller 295 cc/min injectors with larger injectors. Although two 295 >> cc/min >> injectors will probably keep you airborne - its nice to have the option >> of >> running on either pair. But, as I said that is just my personal >> preference. >> >> It sounds to me like the rough running on only secondary, the varying >> EGT, >> etc, smacks of too much fuel for the operating conditions. Try leaning >> it >> more - you can't hurt the engine. >> >> Let us know how it goes >> >> Ed >> >> >> >> Ed Anderson >> >> Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered >> >> Matthews, NC >> >> eanderson@carolina.rr.com >> >> http://www.andersonee.com >> >> http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html >> >> http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> >> http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW >> >> http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On >> Behalf Of Don Wallker >> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:07 PM >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >> Subject: [FlyRotary] responses to responses, not developing full power >> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature >> database 3267 (20080714) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: >> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > database 3267 (20080714) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > database 3267 (20080714) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >