Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #45621
From: William Wilson <fluffysheap@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [Lancair_ES] Re: Rotary Engines
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:56:53 -0700
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
To my knowledge, nobody's had an engine failure in flight due to mechanical problems with the engine itself.  Most of the problems people have had with rotaries have been with cooling or fuel delivery, which I would blame on these systems having to be designed from scratch, often by the builder and on the fly.  It's no surprise this will improve as the knowledge base grows and best practices become more well known, just like rotary car tuners who once blew motors every 20,000 miles ended up being able to make the RX-7 more reliable than it was new.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Bob Perkinson <bobperk90658@bellsouth.net> wrote:
 Gee Ed,
It all depends on what type of engineer you are, some just like to pull the rope and blow the whistle and go on down the road.
Bob P
-------------- Original message from "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>: --------------

Ok, Mark,

 

Yes, engineers can get anal about details.  But, they sometimes forget the rotary is not a piston engine {:>)  Looks like my fame has preceded me, yes, so long as its cold, hot, or luke warm {:>).

 



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster