X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.24] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3452251 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:39:56 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.92.24; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1904055qwd.25 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:39:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eKlujkHNEHCIUOeM5P8zncICB2vo5rTpEAEdEdRA60Q=; b=EKw205liuoJW9a5cUFS3Cu4fp4w2HYtmGHY0c7wvyDrzad6t0S4a5ZT8W5e5ew2xYT /xrXadBNFyIaSmn5/rIFfiZ2EUKkl0thK4tsqlRaJ1WYDwkbUwb0oyEmy58VK99NSEWM 0eZp4ngYAsLAHlunaRIfSd0zyd5IN86vqh8L0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ntFe/zaDUtThwPB1790+MKpAO7EUeBbtUyxTnfK+ONz+3qnZGxy7gQnsfVWUdmFJbS kch+p+lkKiOSsk19GDEnKl840iYGzz2tgiPFMY8SfGqVuv0BL4iKeGrgasBHFa1fQY0n JfIgi9MeFEbIwAcNs95mbxNu5Bh73SGaN2FIw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by 10.214.95.5 with SMTP id s5mr1016404qab.384.1232933961753; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:39:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:39:21 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7b628763806bb843 Message-ID: <1b4b137c0901251739n37c29937rc61ed192ecc48ae9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Looking for a rear counterweight From: Tracy Crook To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175740b4d263ad046158cecd --0015175740b4d263ad046158cecd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Never looked the part numbers up myself but from a physics perspective I'm surprised that the front counterweight would be the same. The rotors form a 'rocking couple' so I would have guessed that a change on one end would have required a similar change on the other. Tracy On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Bill Eslick wrote: > Gang, > > Does anyone have a rear counterweight off a '91-'92 13B NA automatic? I am > rebuilding my '86-'88 13B with the lighter 9.7-1 rotors from a 1991 13B NA, > but it had a manual tranny. The part numbers are the same for the front > weight, but not the rear one, so I need to find a rear weight. > > Any other problems I might run into? > > Bill Eslick > --0015175740b4d263ad046158cecd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Never looked the part numbers up myself but from a physics perspective I= 9;m surprised that the front counterweight would be the same.  The rot= ors form a 'rocking couple'  so I would have guessed that a ch= ange on one end would have required a similar change on the other.

Tracy



On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 a= t 7:32 PM, Bill Eslick <wgeslick@gmail.com> wrote:
Gang,

Does anyone have a rear counterweight off a '91-'92 13= B NA automatic?  I am rebuilding my '86-'88 13B with the light= er 9.7-1 rotors from a 1991 13B NA, but it had a manual tranny.  The p= art numbers are the same for the front weight, but not the rear one, so I n= eed to find a rear weight.

Any other problems I might run into?

Bil= l Eslick

--0015175740b4d263ad046158cecd--