Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #44002
From: Bill Schertz <wschertz@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vacuum Pulses
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:52:27 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
I am new at this engine running thing, having just done the third start/run . I have some instrumentation, and am enclosing a plot of Manifold pressure and Fuel pressure vs. time for the latest run. After letting it warm up at ~14 in MP , I started increasing the power, and you can see that the fuel pressure increases with the MP.  Made one brief excursion to ~5900 rpm, swinging a 76x76 prop.
 
All tests so far are with the cowl off, but the ducts are in place.
 
More tests tomorrow. Longer run, move to higher rpm, test cooling system more
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser #4045
N343BS
----- Original Message -----
From: Al Gietzen
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:51 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vacuum Pulses

Al, after giving some thought about the directions that came with the Mallory pressure regulator, it states that if you are not using a turbo or some other boost device, to just leave the vacuum port open on the regulator, which may be my best option, as  don't think I have any need to leave it hooked up.  No sudden acceleration of engine anticipated.  I plan on doing the orifices for the EC2 though.  JohnD

 

Yes, I agree.  I started out with a unit that was not pressure referenced; for the same reason – NA.  But it turned out that Tracy’s EC2 was setup with the assumption of MAP referenced pressure, and I had trouble getting it tuned.  So I replaced the regulator.  This was in the early days of the EC2; maybe that more recent versions will tune fine without MAP reference.

 

Al

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster