X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.233] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTP id 3035816 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:01:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.198.233; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so1206105rvb.7 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:01:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=c8b13jk+TtuZSV5XvpyFYWaRQPyDRqANLFJjFzg1t+c=; b=BogvX2222pOv2BsF0RimlpR/K33HgCnF5HnCeFz50tTweoFVAK/uAKvPO8V71CVs3Y qBcQCE3C6Y9oV/IsPaLg61voWYtI67Ri1F8jdRE2J3D06ZadzvYd27l4Pdu/R2Xiz8nK I7X/v3gZ7b7eVhMdU3VXJO1XjAdFzP/lZND4c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=P9PNltKOYhLeB6J893uoisiuYJgdDUo1AwjXwIAgkRpYgZa+zteoG1bnX9T7h/2qSR SpXNu0vTzM66NrDE2IlQpdJ0674O1qlnNL/2kzw40FSo1hQbU9PUWCaPCTdVGhvYvWN2 oibSWRp0xeYFG1p4wUH04Wc6U8BsNCIh8K3h4= Received: by 10.140.135.19 with SMTP id i19mr1996380rvd.169.1216663275457; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.82.18 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b4b137c0807211101o69cc5d30sc01f03c5a8cae3a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:01:15 -0400 From: "Tracy Crook" Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: exhaust manifold In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_76572_24001384.1216663275463" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: e5a6df6a66582d47 ------=_Part_76572_24001384.1216663275463 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Weight is a bit high for that thing (compared to a 321 SS header) but it will certainly allow for that modest power requirement. Tracy On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Kelly Troyer wrote: > Michael, > Other than the loss of exhaust scavenging and the resulting slight > loss of power as Ernest mentioned there should be no down side and > 155 hp should not be a problem with an efficient intake system ....Are > you going with fuel injection ??............ > -- > Kelly Troyer > "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine > "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 > "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold > > > > > > -------------- Original message from Ernest Christley < > echristley@nc.rr.com>: -------------- > > > > Michael Silvius wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > I have no intention of ruining a turbo on my engine but the notion of > using a mostly ready made manifold is appealing. I am thinking of adapting > one of these turbo manifolds, delete the waste gate pipe and continue on > with the exhaust pipe where the turbo would normally be mounted. Not looking > to make more than > > about 155hp. Anything I am missing here? > > > > > http://images.marketplaceadvisor.channeladvisor.com/fullView.asp?id=241330336&fc > > =0&img=http://www.stockreco.com/fc3sheader04.jpg > > > > > > Michael in Maine > > > > > You'll destroy any hope of ever being able to do exhaust scavenging. Do > > you think the company might consider doing a version of their Mvc-RX72f > > without the wastegate? http://www.ssautochrome.com/level.itml/icOid/1357 > > > > -- > > > > http://www.ronpaultimeline.com > > > > > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > ------=_Part_76572_24001384.1216663275463 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Weight is a bit high for that thing (compared to a 321 SS header) but it will certainly allow for that modest power requirement.
 
Tracy

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Kelly Troyer <keltro@att.net> wrote:
  Michael,
      Other than the loss of exhaust scavenging and the resulting slight
loss of power as Ernest mentioned there  should be no down side and
155 hp should not be a problem with an efficient intake system ....Are
you going with fuel injection ??............
--
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold



 
-------------- Original message from Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>: --------------


> Michael Silvius wrote:
> > Folks:
> > > I have no intention of ruining a turbo on my engine but the notion of using a mostly ready made manifold is appealing. I am thinking of adapting one of these turbo manifolds, delete the waste gate pipe and continue on with the exhaust pipe where the turbo would normally be mounted. Not looking to make more than
> about 155hp. Anything I am missing here?
> > > http://images.marketplaceadvisor.channeladvisor.com/fullView.asp?id=241330336&fc
> =0&img=http://www.stockreco.com/fc3sheader04.jpg
> >
> > Michael in Maine
> >
> You'll destroy any hope of ever being able to do exhaust scavenging. Do
> you think the company might consider doing a version of their Mvc-RX72f
> without the wastegate? http://www.ssautochrome.com/level.itml/icOid/1357
>
> --
>
> http://www.ronpaultimeline.com
>
>
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

------=_Part_76572_24001384.1216663275463--