X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from pan.gwi.net ([207.5.128.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with ESMTPS id 3035566 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:23:16 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.5.128.165; envelope-from=silvius@gwi.net Received: from yourlk4rlmsu41 (bb-216-195-174-159.gwi.net [216.195.174.159]) by pan.gwi.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id m6LFMXjQ036627 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:22:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from silvius@gwi.net) Message-ID: <002a01c8eb4d$e24e98b0$9faec3d8@yourlk4rlmsu41> From: "Michael Silvius" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: exhaust manifold Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:21:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8EB23.F7F65D80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8EB23.F7F65D80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kelly: No right now I am aiming for a carbureted system. Preferably gravity fed = for absolute simplicity. I really don't think I'd ever want a turbo and = the inherent additional complexity involved. Aiming to keep it real = basic. I have a couple of old NOS dual points distributors. I do have a = set up made up as Tracy's early 3 Mikunni system but do not rule out a = EC2 system down the road. The 155 hp is more than plenty and even = perhaps over the top for the Falconar F12. Right now I am not even sure that manifold will clear my engine mount. = That again is as Tracy's early set up. I have a message in to the vendor = for some dimensions.=20 Michael in Maine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Kelly Troyer=20 Michael, Other than the loss of exhaust scavenging and the resulting = slight loss of power as Ernest mentioned there should be no down side and 155 hp should not be a problem with an efficient intake system ....Are you going with fuel injection ??............ -- ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8EB23.F7F65D80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Kelly:
 
No right now I am aiming for a = carbureted system.=20 Preferably gravity fed for absolute simplicity. I really don't think I'd = ever=20 want a turbo and the inherent additional complexity involved. Aiming to = keep it=20 real basic. I have a couple of old NOS dual points = distributors. I do=20 have a set up made up as Tracy's early 3 Mikunni system but do not rule = out a=20 EC2 system down the road. The 155 hp is more than plenty and even=20 perhaps over the top for the Falconar F12.
 
Right now I am not even sure that = manifold will=20 clear my engine mount. That again is as Tracy's early set up. I have a = message=20 in to the vendor for some dimensions.
 
Michael in Maine
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Kelly = Troyer

  Michael,
      Other than the loss of exhaust = scavenging=20 and the resulting slight
loss of power as Ernest mentioned there  should be no=20 down side and
155 hp should not be a problem with an efficient intake=20 system ....Are
you going with fuel injection ??............
--
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8EB23.F7F65D80--