X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from web52710.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.233] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with SMTP id 2978484 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:43:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 10174 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Jun 2008 20:43:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=aW8Zxnllv9/5KQwJxiOMk68wZj5o+06iib22KjNV05MB0mG8JKF00QA+stcKPG7LKlz/bStXUbY2PVgzUi+XHpLCwLKIn/FXmHweqiB/dlhJs7QGOg0PEe6Xgx2lqEpkDZMqEx8h1Iyd9NNDn7jD/wcN95mMkYmb8SVeqDOBXzs=; Received: from [24.113.18.62] by web52710.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:43:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.199 Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:43:29 -0700 (PDT) From: John Overman Reply-To: mooneydryver@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Turbo Bites the dust To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <294414.9887.qm@web52710.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Steve I also have one of Bryan's upgrades. I'm not flying yet but I'm leaving the= "actuator" installed and plan to control it with a control cable from the = panel. In the off position that will cut off the exhaust to one of the two = turbine wheels. Since I will be mostly turbo-normalizing I think it will be= pretty hard to overtax the turbo. --- On Sat, 6/21/08, Steve Brooks wrote: > From: Steve Brooks > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Turbo Bites the dust > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Date: Saturday, June 21, 2008, 1:20 PM > David, > Sorry to hear about your turbo. Especially sorry since I > have one also. > As I recall though, your turbo was an 86-87, which had a > somewhat different > design. When I had mine done, the core was an 89-91, which > was about $200 > cheaper. Bryan at BNR turbo told me that the 89-91 was > much easier to > upgrade was the reason. >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t know if mine will last any longer though. 130 > hours of mostly WOT > doesn=E2=80=99t really sound all that bad. It will be > interesting to see what went > bad on it. Sounds like it may be the bearings though from > the sounds of it. >=20 > Regards, > Steve Brooks >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft > [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > Behalf Of David Leonard > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 11:47 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Another Turbo Bites the dust >=20 > Today I flew from San Diego to Brownville Texas to attend a > formation flying > clinic. After 6 hours of WOT flight I was descending > through 5000' (down > from 15.5k) an just a few miles from the airport when I had > a sudden and > sickening drop in manifold pressure. The engine was still > running fine, > and I had plenty of altitude to make the runway, so I > continued on debating > weather or not to flip the turbo oil shutoff switch. I had > grown to respect > this turbo so much that I finally decided that I had just > blown out a > fitting somewhere in the intake system downstream of the > turbo. I even > continued on to a low pass for show rather than just > landing. When I > eventually had time to take off the cowl I was dissapointed > to find that all > the fitting were in place and that the compressor wheel > turns only with > significant resistance. >=20 > So the turbo is dead, and I am out of the formation clinic > and will have to > decide tomorrow about flying home with a dead turbo. Will > maybe be able to > take a look in the hot side and see what I see. >=20 > This turbo was the TO4 hybrid with a fixed wide open waste > gate. It had 130 > hrs of mostly hard duty. Sigh. >=20 > -- > David Leonard >=20 > Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY > http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net > http://RotaryRoster.net