Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: flyrotary
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:01:20 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1734917@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <rv8r300@attbi.com>
Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com ([216.148.227.88] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7)
  with ESMTP id 1734918 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:00:12 -0400
Received: from user ([12.224.119.102]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP
          id <20020917010013.YPDO26805.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@user>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:00:13 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <000b01c25de5$7eaa9e40$6677e00c@user>
From: "3 rotor" <rv8r300@attbi.com>
X-Original-To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1734878@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary]Re: Tach sensor
X-Original-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:59:36 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

why not simply add another calibration arc to your tach, just like my
airspeed that reads in mph and knots?  Simple, accurate, zero weight gain.
Kevin