Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2704754 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:06:47 -0500 Received: from rad ([68.212.11.237]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20031031200644.VGFT1843.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rad> for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:06:44 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] LS1 Coils Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:06:45 -0600 Message-ID: <005301c39fea$8285b430$6001a8c0@rad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0054_01C39FB8.37EB4430" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C39FB8.37EB4430 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit However, I cannot seem to dig up how the LS1 coils were arrived at as a substitute for the stock 13b coils. It would be appreciated if someone could provide a history lesson on why the LS1 coils seem to be the chosen alternative to the stock coils. Was it weight alone? More energy? Better reliability? Tracy may be the only one who can answer this. I'm betting it's a combination of weight, cost, and availability, with performance being a given. Oh and mentioning spark plug wires, if I am using the LS1 coils, do they dictate the use of a particular brand, core, length, etc.? Thanx... -Scott Stout Here's a link to a message in the archives. There's some info from Al, and a follow-up from me. http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/Message/1690.html Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C39FB8.37EB4430 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

However, I cannot seem to dig up how the LS1 = coils
were=20 arrived at as a substitute for the stock 13b
coils.  It would be = appreciated if someone could
provide a history lesson on why the LS1 = coils=20 seem to
be the chosen alternative to the stock coils.  Was = it
weight=20 alone?  More energy?  Better reliability?

 
Tracy = may be the only=20 one who can answer this.  I'm betting it's a combination of weight, = cost,=20 and availability, with performance being a given.


Oh and
mentioning spark plug wires, if I am using the = LS1
coils, do=20 they dictate the use of a particular brand,
core, length,=20 etc.?

Thanx...

-Scott Stout

Here's a link to a = message in the=20 archives.  There's some info from Al, and a follow-up from = me. =20

http:= //lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/Message/1690.html
 
Cheers,
Rusty



------=_NextPart_000_0054_01C39FB8.37EB4430--