Return-Path: Received: from out003.verizon.net ([206.46.170.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2703117 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:21:38 -0500 Received: from netzero.net ([4.4.58.190]) by out003.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20031030172133.EAXY1420.out003.verizon.net@netzero.net> for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:21:33 -0600 Message-ID: <3FA1489A.5050300@netzero.net> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:21:30 -0500 From: Finn Lassen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake manifold References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out003.verizon.net from [4.4.58.190] at Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:21:33 -0600 Ed's your man. It's all about the porting. If the port locations on the 1989 are the same as the 1990 and 1991, then you're all set. Finn Marvin Kaye wrote: > Posted for "sqpilot@earthlink" : > > Hi, Finn....Unfortunately, I was unable to attend Tracy and Laura's > fly-in and to sit in on Ed's educational lecture. You mentioned the > 1988 as needing intakes 4 inches longer than the primaries, and that > the 1990 and 1991 turbo models should have all intake runners the same > length. Unfortunately, my engine is right between those years....It > is a 1989 turbo model. Any Idea what type of configuration the intake > runners should be for the 1989 turbo? Thanks in advance for your > reply. Paul Conner > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > >