Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2649042 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:31:33 -0400 Received: from 204.127.135.58 ([204.127.135.58]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2003102404301111200knn3pe>; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:30:11 +0000 Received: from [12.74.168.146] by 204.127.135.58; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:30:11 +0000 From: keltro@att.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP check valves Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:30:11 +0000 Message-Id: <102420030430.3251.4a3f@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 10 2003) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= Ernest, I am still planning on remote radiators but not as far to the rear of the Delta as you have indicated. I plan on mounting a GM evaporator on each side of the a/c to the rear of the firewall between the second and third rib inboard of the Delta centersection. the large 9.5"x13" evaporators fit very well here. I am using a NACA report on radiators buried in wings from the 1940's to size, shape and position the inlets and outlets. I will use alum. tubing and short hose connectors. Not sure of what size yet but will be larger than 5/8" but smaller than 2". I am leaning toward 1.25" or 1.5". I am considering running the alum tube inside a duct that I can put cooling air through. Kelly Troyer -- Dyke Delta/13B Rotary Power > Ernest, > Getting the water to and from a remotely mounted > radiator is not as big an issue as getting enough > airflow through it while on the ground taxiing. > Chances are the engine will overheat before you even > get to the end of the runway. > How do you propose the cool the engine on the ground? > Just curious, as Kelly Troyer was comtemplating > remotely mounting his radiators too. I don't know what > he finally decided. > Jim > --- Original Message --- > From: echristley@nc.rr.com > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP check valves > > >This is a significant issue for me. I'm considering > a remotely located radiator. Running 2" hose for 7ft > or so is out of the question.