Return-Path: Received: from fed1mtao06.cox.net ([68.6.19.125] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2648236 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:49:24 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([68.107.116.221]) by fed1mtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031023154920.GDN8365.fed1mtao06.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:49:20 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] New cooling Model example Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:49:29 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c3997d$3ea57b60$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C39942.9246A360" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C39942.9246A360 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There are some comments and notes with each case. Take a look and if inclinded I would greatly appreciate any feedback. Ed; I looked it over to maybe make some comments; but I don't know what I'm looking at. Maybe I missed because I haven't read previous posts, but general questions are; What sort of modeling is this, empirical or theoretical? I don't see any formulas in the spreadsheet. What are the independant variables (input) and what are the dependant variables (output)? Is this for a specific airplane? Fixed HE configuration? Only specific point is the 35% penalty for "thick" radiator, but the thickness is fine as long as you have sufficient pressure recovery in the inlet duct to overcome PD across the core and other losses. Anyway, I don't expect you to write a manual, but if you have nothing else to do (yeah..right) educate me a little. Al ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C39942.9246A360 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

There are some comments and notes with each case. Take a look and = if

inclinded I would greatly appreciate any feedback.

Ed;

<= /font>

I looked it = over to maybe make some comments; but I don’t know what I’m looking = at. Maybe I missed because I haven’t read previous posts, but general = questions are;

<= /font>

What sort of = modeling is this, empirical or theoretical? I don’t see any formulas = in the spreadsheet.

What are the = independant variables (input) and what are the dependant variables = (output)?

Is this for a = specific airplane? Fixed HE configuration?

Only specific = point is the 35% penalty for “thick” radiator, but the thickness is = fine as long as you have sufficient pressure recovery in the inlet duct to = overcome PD across the core and other losses.

<= /font>

Anyway, I = don’t expect you to write a manual, but if you have nothing else to do = (yeah..right) educate me a little.

<= /font>

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C39942.9246A360--