Return-Path: Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2647228 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:44:46 -0400 Received: from www2.prodigy.net (www2-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.61.49]) by pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with SMTP id h9MKikIN212198 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:44:46 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Message-Id: Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:44:46 -0500 From: DELTAFLYER@prodigy.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP check valves Ernest, Getting the water to and from a remotely mounted radiator is not as big an issue as getting enough airflow through it while on the ground taxiing. Chances are the engine will overheat before you even get to the end of the runway. How do you propose the cool the engine on the ground? Just curious, as Kelly Troyer was comtemplating remotely mounting his radiators too. I don't know what he finally decided. Jim --- Original Message --- From: echristley@nc.rr.com To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP check valves >This is a significant issue for me. I'm considering a remotely located radiator. Running 2" hose for 7ft or so is out of the question. > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html