X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2580404 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:52:53 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.104; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from [209.215.62.218] (host-209-215-62-218.jan.bellsouth.net[209.215.62.218]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with ESMTP id <20071214035212H0400a4d62e>; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:52:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [209.215.62.218] Message-ID: <4761FDEB.6040903@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:52:11 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071030 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: HCCi Engine Technology References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 12/13/2007 4:53:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, > lendich@optusnet.com.au writes: > >> Their comments on the technology are as mentioned before either high >> compression or intake heating are required. Supercharging or intake is >> also a way to high cylinder pressure. Right now they say that the >> trouble for the tech is controlling the timing event. They say the >> system works well but doesn't transition to high load well. Right now >> another hopeful technology that's not ready quite yet. >> Bill Jepson > > > About 30 years ago a guy named Yanuck built a V-2 from part of a small > block Chevy. It had a small turbo to maintain positive inlet pressure > and the exhaust system strung through the inlet manifold. It was mounted > in an old Mercury Capri. It would pull away from a stop at near zero RPM > in top gear. It had the Capri carb. Got great milage. Never detonated. > Was quiet. > GM engineers drove it with him in the seat beside them. One couldn't > believe that the exhaust system was coiled inside the intake, so he put > his hand on it and burned himself comprehensively. > Smokey was paid to work on various projects for GM. This car and engine > were not on the GM list, and was all Smokys ideas. He wanted to maintain > control of the idea, and GM wanted to buy it outright. So instead of > buying a license from Smokey and being the top of the heap today, GM > shoved the pistol down behind their belt buckle and pulled the trigger. > > Smokey disassembled the engine and crushed the car. The superheated > intake idea and its refined effective systems died with smokey. And > still the struggle goes on to achieve what has been done so long ago. > > Lynn E. Hanover > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Yunick Unbelievable genius. He used to write for 'Popular Science' magazine back in the '60s. One of my favorite writers when I was a kid. Built a small block Camaro that outran the big block cars on the NASCAR tracks back then. Charlie