X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with ESMTP id 2461007 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:29:19 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.2; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.cff.1bff770f (39953) for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:28:31 -0500 (EST) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:28:31 EST Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Total,duct, Ambient or Velocity???? To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1194499711" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5044 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1194499711 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ed, The slide is a good way to explain the various references. I am still confused as to what will give you the "best" data. The static in duct pressure compared to the total, or to the velocity? It probably doesn't matter if you use the same method all the time. Bill Jepson ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com -------------------------------1194499711 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ed, The slide is a good way to explain the various references. I am sti= ll=20 confused as to what will give you the "best" data. The static in duct pressu= re=20 compared to the total, or to the velocity?  It probably doesn't matter=20= if=20 you use the same method all the time.
Bill Jepson
 



See what's new= at AOL.com an= d Make AOL Your Homepage.
-------------------------------1194499711--