Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:44:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.93.67.84] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2642711 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:27:43 -0400 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id h9JJRguf027834 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:27:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <003101c39676$d6ebf0c0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RotaryEng List was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Series vs PARALLEL pumps & flowmeter X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:26:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: RotaryEng List was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Series vs PARALLEL pumps & flowmeter > Ed, Let that be a lesson, never EVER get between an engineer and his pet > theory, you do so at your peril. > > Rick Girard > > Hey, I hear you, Rick! {:>). And being an engineer, I should have know {:>), but apparently forgot if I did. Its a great list and I do enjoy the give and take Thanks Ed Anderson