Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:42:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.93.67.83] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2642438 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:33:02 -0400 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id h9JCX09k012070 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:33:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <000801c3963c$e9e1cf40$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RotaryEng List X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 08:31:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3961B.62963380" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3961B.62963380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John Slade=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:08 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: RotaryEng List was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP = Series vs PARALLEL pumps & flowmeter > Now you guys are likely to be stuck with me totally {:>). =20 I think that makes us the winners, Ed. The mission is the same, but = there seems to be very little of practical value going on "over there" = lately. Anyone reading just that list wouldn't even be aware of the = recent turbo and EWP successes by Rusty & Todd.=20 Regards, John Slade I agree, John, that there is more activity on this list dealing = directly with putting rotaries in the air and keeping them there. = Besides, the tenor of the discussions are more trying to resolve a = question rather than someone trying to prove right or wrong. In any = case, I certainly feel welcomed here and it was becoming clearer as time = went on that my "contributions" were not exactly appreciated on the = other list. So thanks Ed Anderson ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3961B.62963380 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John=20 Slade
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 = 12:08=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = RotaryEng List=20 was Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP Series vs PARALLEL pumps & = flowmeter

 > Now you guys are likely = to be=20 stuck with me totally {:>).   
I=20 think that makes us the winners, Ed. The mission is the same, but = there seems=20 to be very little of practical value going on "over there" lately.=20 Anyone reading just that list wouldn't even be aware of the = recent turbo=20 and EWP successes by Rusty & Todd.
Regards,
John=20 Slade
 
I = agree, John,=20 that there is more activity on this list dealing directly with = putting=20 rotaries in the air and keeping them there.  Besides, the tenor = of the=20 discussions are more trying to resolve a question rather than someone = trying=20 to prove right or wrong. In any case, I certainly feel welcomed = here and=20 it was becoming clearer as time went on that my "contributions" were = not=20 exactly appreciated on the other list.
 
 So=20 thanks
 
Ed=20 Anderson
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3961B.62963380--