Return-Path: Received: from out009.verizon.net ([206.46.170.131] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2644117 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:55:23 -0400 Received: from [67.225.117.184] ([65.239.57.240]) by out009.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20031020215522.BUUN4096.out009.verizon.net@[67.225.117.184]> for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:55:22 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: res0c5l1@incoming.verizon.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:56:18 -0700 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Ken Welter Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP check valves Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1145435508==_ma============" X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out009.verizon.net from [65.239.57.240] at Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:55:21 -0500 --============_-1145435508==_ma============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > >Personally, I may try to make valves that can be welded to the >radiator, so they don't take up as much space. I haven't really >collected enough data to know what I'm going to do yet. > >Rusty > > I that sounds like the best idea, lightest weight and the most compact. Ken --============_-1145435508==_ma============ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" [FlyRotary] Re: EWP check valves
 
Personally, I may try to make valves that can be welded to the radiator, so they don't take up as much space.  I haven't really collected enough data to know what I'm going to do yet. 
 
Rusty
 
 

  I that sounds like the best idea, lightest weight and the most compact.

 Ken
--============_-1145435508==_ma============--