X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 2362795 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:17:09 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.c30.1c52861f (34930) for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:16:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from WEBMAIL-MB17 (webmail-mb17.webmail.aol.com [64.12.170.165]) by cia-da04.mx.aol.com (v119.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA043-8872470163a6359; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:16:22 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] motor decisions! Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:16:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8C9D28773D5AD6E_CC4_C3BA_WEBMAIL-MB17.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 30978-STANDARD Received: from 65.161.241.3 by WEBMAIL-MB17.sysops.aol.com (64.12.170.165) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:16:22 -0400 Message-Id: <8C9D28773D5AD6E-CC4-6103@WEBMAIL-MB17.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 64.12.170.165 X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8C9D28773D5AD6E_CC4_C3BA_WEBMAIL-MB17.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Andrew, A 13B especially a Perpheral Port version caneasily make 200HP. Guru= motorsports there in Australia could help you do a P-Port engine. It makes=20= the plumbing easier (only 2 intake tubes) and the weight with a reduction dr= ive will be around that of a 340 or 360. (Lighter if done well) I'm building= an RV-10 which normally requires a 540, so the weight of the 20B isn't a pr= oblem, it's lighter. The HP required 260 is well within the ability of the 2= 0B. It is overkill for a 200HP plane. If you don't want to keep it you could= get good money for it. You could probably get the 13B and PSRU for the pric= e of the 20B alone.=20 Bill Jepson -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Martin To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:20 am Subject: [FlyRotary] motor decisions! Hi=20 have a 20b and about to start building a plane that is designed for a O 360. It has been suggested to me that I should change to a 2 rotor to ave weight. I=E2=80=99ve gone through the archives but didn=E2=80=99t really= find any ro=E2=80=99 and con=E2=80=99s of 3 or 2 rotors other than the max power avai= lable. he plane will be used almost exclusively for long X-country cruising nce the bugs are worked out and hours flown off. =20 f my estimated max power required due to VNE is around 200hp, is the enesis always the engine of choice or are there advantages to keeping he 20b, accepting the weight penalty and letting the engine loaf along. originally presumed the 20b would be better for me especially when at y gross weight of 2420 lbs. but now I am unsure, so to change now ather than later would be easier. ny help from anyone flying either engine, and points that governed your ngine of choice would be greatly appreciated. egards ndrew Martin estern Australia -- omepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ rchive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.ht= ml ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http= ://mail.aol.com ----------MB_8C9D28773D5AD6E_CC4_C3BA_WEBMAIL-MB17.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Andrew, A 13B especially a Perpheral Port version caneasily make 200HP.= Guru motorsports there in Australia could help you do a P-Port engine. It m= akes the plumbing easier (only 2 intake tubes) and the weight with a reducti= on drive will be around that of a 340 or 360. (Lighter if done well) I'm bui= lding an RV-10 which normally requires a 540, so the weight of the 20B isn't= a problem, it's lighter. The HP required 260 is well within the ability of=20= the 20B. It is overkill for a 200HP plane. If you don't want to keep it you=20= could get good money for it. You could probably get the 13B and PSRU for the= price of the 20B alone.
Bill Jepson



-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Martin <andrew@martinag.com.au>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:20 am
Subject: [FlyRotary] motor decisions!

Hi=20
I have a 20b and about to start building a plane that is designed for a
IO 360. It has been suggested to me that I should change to a 2 rotor to
save weight. I=E2=80=99ve gone through the archives but didn=E2=80=99t reall=
y find any
pro=E2=80=99 and con=E2=80=99s of 3 or 2 rotors other than the max power ava=
ilable.
The plane will be used almost exclusively for long X-country cruising
once the bugs are worked out and hours flown off. =20
If my estimated max power required due to VNE is around 200hp, is the
Renesis always the engine of choice or are there advantages to keeping
the 20b, accepting the weight penalty and letting the engine loaf along.
I originally presumed the 20b would be better for me especially when at
my gross weight of 2420 lbs. but now I am unsure, so to change now
rather than later would be easier.
Any help from anyone flying either engine, and points that governed your
engine of choice would be greatly appreciated.
=20
Regards
Andrew Martin
Western Australia
 


 



--
Homepage:  http://www.=
flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyro=
tary/List.html
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!
----------MB_8C9D28773D5AD6E_CC4_C3BA_WEBMAIL-MB17.sysops.aol.com--