|
I find that very very interesting then. Doesn't mesh with what I leaned in college chem. Thanks for the chart.
Dave
Ron Springer wrote:
60% antifreeze and 40% water is the lowest according
to this website which includes a chart:
http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF6/680.html
Ron Springer
Folsom, CA
--- David Staten <Dastaten@earthlink.net> wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I've been working so many hours lately that I
really have not had much time
for flying. It had been a month since I had flown
my turbo rotary powered
Cozy IV, though I had run it on two occasions
prior.
On the 4th of July, I drained the anti-freeze, and
replaced it with
distilled water. Well, maybe 5% antifreeze is
left, but not more than that.
I took of this morning, with the OAT at 70 degrees.
I took off at my usual
5 lbs of boost on the turbo, and rotated at 80
knots about 1500 feet later.
While the flight was outstanding, with smooth air
an nearly unlimited
visibility, I did not see any marked improvement in
the straight water, over
the 50/50 water / antifreeze mixture.
The advantage out of a 50/50 mix is that it will
boil at a higher temp and freeze at a lower temp than any other ratio of
water/antifreeze. Ask any high school chemistry teacher. Improved cooling
is not typically one of the benefits seen, if all other variables are
kept equal.
Glad you had an uneventful flight.
Dave
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|