X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2021361 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 May 2007 10:02:01 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.72; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 May 2007 07:00:09 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,480,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="482918719:sNHT42265562" Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l42E07xo017987 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 10:00:07 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l42DxalU019842 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 14:00:07 GMT Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 2 May 2007 09:59:48 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.210] ([64.102.38.210]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 2 May 2007 09:59:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4638995D.4010607@nc.rr.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 09:59:57 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Throttle body size/ other "Paul" issues References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2007 13:59:48.0129 (UTC) FILETIME=[25561110:01C78CC2] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral John Slade wrote: > What really puzzles me is why anyone serious about using a rotary in > an airplane would waste their time subscribing to PLs "egoblog" in the > first place. Why try to sift through slanted (and censored) > unsubstantiated (and in many cases disproved) opinions and prejudices > of one man who has`no actual experience of installing a flying engine > when those with the real knowledge and experience are here in > flyrotary. What am I missing? Because we're all a bunch of hairy-chested cowboys with no concern for safety? It's nice and comforting to know that there is someone with all the answers, you know.