Return-Path: Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2629370 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:05:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 30065 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 02:05:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.97.8]) (envelope-sender ) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 9 Oct 2003 02:05:55 -0000 Message-ID: <3F84B493.7CA46AB8@frontiernet.net> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:06:27 -0400 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intercoolers References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Turbo Tom showed me the one in his car and told me half of that would work for a 13B airplane. Didn't seem huge or anything. Seemed quite manageable, but the devil is in the details. I'll talk to him some more ... Jim S. PS I think ... to liquid works better on automatic transmissions and perhaps oil coolers. Air to air would be the only viable option for turbo intercoolers. JJ JOHNSON wrote: > Another Question for the list, what intercoolers are recommended by you > tubro guroo's? Air-air or Air-Liquid? > > I had a look at the mentioned Turbonetics site and they have both. > > Thanks > Jarrett Johnson > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html