Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:33:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.93.67.82] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2628524 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 08:31:32 -0400 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id h98CVTLe018105 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:31:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <005801c38d97$d15829e0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] EWP - Success at last X-Original-Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:29:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0055_01C38D76.49DA3380" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C38D76.49DA3380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Haywire=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:01 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] EWP - Success at last and the continuing story.... Boy did this one ever drag out but it appears to be a happy = ending. I will start from somewhere near the beginning as I see Jim is = back and not completely up to speed on the story, (by the way SNIP I realize that testing is far from complete but this should be = enough to prove that an EWP can work in an aircraft without consuming = vast quantities of power. While I was getting a little frustrated at an = empty mailbox everyday (well not quite, plenty of bills), I'm glad I = didn't give up on it as I'm very pleased with the EWP. S. Todd Bartrim Turbo 13B RV-9Endurance C-FSTB Great report! Todd Both on the oddsey of your pumps throught the shipping system but more = importantly on the EWP. Clearly proves that power and capacity of an = EWP is no longer a question so far as cooling the flying rotary. Do you = have any data on how much current your EWP is drawing at its max flow = rate? Or did you mention it and I missed it? Ed Anderson ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C38D76.49DA3380 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----- = Original Message=20 -----
From:=20 Haywire
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, = 2003 3:01=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] EWP - = Success at=20 last

and = the continuing=20 story....
    Boy did this one ever drag out but it appears to be a happy=20 ending. I will start from somewhere near the beginning as I see = Jim is=20 back and not completely up to speed on the story, (by the=20 way
 
 =20 SNIP
 
   I = realize that=20 testing is far from complete but this should be enough to prove that = an EWP=20 can work in an aircraft without consuming vast quantities of power. = While I=20 was getting a little frustrated at an empty mailbox everyday (well not = quite,=20 plenty of bills), I'm glad I didn't give up on it as I'm = very=20 pleased with the EWP.

S. Todd Bartrim
Turbo 13B=20 RV-9Endurance
C-FSTB

Great report! Todd

Both on the oddsey of your pumps = throught the=20 shipping system but more importantly on the EWP.  Clearly proves = that=20 power and capacity of an EWP is no longer a question so far as cooling = the=20 flying rotary.  Do you have any data on how much current your EWP = is=20 drawing at its max flow rate?  Or did you mention it and I missed = it?

 

Ed = Anderson

------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C38D76.49DA3380--