Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #34623
From: kevin lane <n3773@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: gauges
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:59:37 -0800
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
I have 1000 trouble-free hrs on a $15 mechanical automotive oil pressure gauge.  it has a 1/8" plastic line from the firewall to the gauge.  I just put a new panel in and the plastic line looked as good as new.  granted, I have an O-320, but I doubt the gauge can tell.  cheaper. lighter, reliable, fewer parts, no electrical demands/needs.  if there were a leak I would guess it would take quite a while to pump 6 qts of oil onto the cabin floor.  at least you'd know it, whereas with a sender unit failure in the engine compartment you might not know until the pressure dropped.  after having intermittent problems with my autopilot (it just let's go sometimes) I realized how difficult debugging some systems can be and consequentially left all the steam gauges in my panel.(that eggs in one basket thing)  the vibrational environment of an airplane makes many things fail that won't on the bench.     kevin
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:26 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: gauges

Group,
 
Fixing to get oil pressure gauge and am concerned about the quality of the electrical sending units.  How likely are they to leak or come apart and cause complete oil loss?
Using a mechanical gauge eliminates the sender but uses a capillary tube that can break. What are the pros and cons to electrical gauges?
 
Wendell

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster