X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [12.2.188.41] (HELO exchange1.weathershield.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1593105 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:54:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=12.2.188.41; envelope-from=dparkinson@weathershield.com X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Rotary engines in aircraft other than kit built Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:52:57 -0600 Message-ID: <591CDF74B3DE6D4DAD00BF869DFFAC3610D0C04B@wsmail1.TSC.COM> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Rotary engines in aircraft other than kit built Thread-Index: AccOCZA8MPywy8YgSpGGc+/z2X0ijQAMlbOQ From: "Parkinson, Dwayne" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Consider looking on Barnstormers for an experimental four seater like a Bede, Velocity or Cozy instead of a 172 so you can swap engines a little easier. I'm not up on the regulations but I would expect that swapping engines in an experimental is less punishing.=20