X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [216.211.128.142] (HELO mail-in04.adhost.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTPS id 1573939 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:45:30 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.211.128.142; envelope-from=joeh@PilgrimTech.com Received: from Pilgrim10 (c-67-183-14-47.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.183.14.47]) by mail-in04.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72006B8052 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:45:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joeh@PilgrimTech.com) From: "Joe Hull" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Where am I? Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:45:05 -0800 Message-ID: <003f01c709d0$dcc5da30$8802a8c0@Pilgrim10> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0040_01C7098D.CEA29A30" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AccJu2kXNIBwLKqjQJSl1AEOJV2CzgAFVVmg In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C7098D.CEA29A30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was always told to eschew obfuscation! Joe Hull Redmond/Seattle WA, Cozy-Mazda Rotary 69hrs =20 =20 _____ =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:11 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Where am I? =20 Sorry, Al. The word should be "obfuscation " - but you see, "obstrufication" did its job of further obfuscating meaning. = Interestingly enough I found over 50 web hits for the "word" obstrufication, but could = not find it in a single on-line dictionary I tired. A few examples of it = usage: I offered specific and cognizant assistance without obstrufication and personal ancedotes=20 The distinction as to what constitutes a methodology and what = constitutes a method is fraught with contradiction and obstrufication. OK, so security through obstrufication (sp?) isn't the best thing (This person at least had some doubts {:>) In the end we broke through the layers of obstrufication and as a = committee ... Cela ressemble pas mal =E0 de l'obstrufication, et franchement, c'est de = la mauvaise volont=E9 non d=E9guis=E9e. (Apparently it even appears in = different languages {:>) The only other thing I would feel strongly about is suitable = obstrufication of the data such as e-mails as nobody wants a spam harvest. ... What is even more interesting - is the spelling of this none-existant = word appears to have a standard {:>)_ Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Where am I? >=20 > obstrufication ??????? >=20 > Ed >=20 >=20 > Al >=20 >=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > ------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C7098D.CEA29A30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I was always told to eschew = obfuscation!

Joe Hull

Redmond/Seattle WA, Cozy-Mazda Rotary = 69hrs

 

 

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Thursday, November = 16, 2006 12:11 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = FW: Where am I?

 

Sorry, Al.  The word should be "obfuscation = " - but you see, "obstrufication" did its job of further = obfuscating meaning.  Interestingly enough I found over 50 web hits for the "word" obstrufication, but could not find it in a single = on-line dictionary I tired.  A few examples of it usage:


I offered specific and = cognizant assistance without obstrufication<= /strong> and personal ancedotes

The distinction as to what constitutes a methodology and what = constitutes a method is fraught with contradiction and obstrufication<= /strong>.

OK, so security through obstrufication = (sp?) isn't the best thing  = (This person at least had some = doubts {:>)

In the end = we broke through the layers of obstrufication<= /strong> and as a committee ...

Cela ressemble pas mal =E0 de = l'obstrufication, et franchement, c'est de la = mauvaise volont=E9 non d=E9guis=E9e. (Apparently it even appears in different languages {:>)

The only other thing I would feel strongly about is suitable = obstrufication of the data such as e-mails as nobody wants a spam harvest. ...

What is even more interesting - is the spelling of this none-existant = word appears to have a standard {:>)_

Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in = aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Where am I?


>
> obstrufication  ???????
>
> Ed
>
>
> Al
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>

------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C7098D.CEA29A30--